All 59 answers of the audit are written.

Your site offers unique art pieces to people looking for one-of-a-kind decorations. You provide a wide variety of creative works that serve as the main attraction for your visitors. These products are intended for customers who want to own something special rather than mass-produced items. This focus on variety helps you reach different types of art lovers across your collection.

A conversion (the specific action you want a visitor to take, such as buying something or signing up) on your site happens when someone uses a buy page to make a purchase or a lead magnet page to give you their contact information. We also see activity through your landing pages and article pages, which help guide people toward those final actions.

Everything looks fine as it is because your site structure is already well-organized. You do not need to make any immediate changes to how you categorize your pages. If you decide to expand your content, your web developer or the person who writes your pages can manage it as a small job.

AkOOre's own measurement system identified 5 distinct market segments for your site. These groups represent different types of people searching the web for art-related topics.

• Art history enthusiasts — 825,990 searches a month, $1.30 per click, informational.
• Personalized gift seekers — 398,390 searches a month, $4.07 per click, transactional.
• Residential interior decorators — 360,310 searches a month, $1.67 per click, commercial.
• Scarcity-seeking collectors — 182,540 searches a month, $1.69 per click, commercial.
• Style transformation seekers — 102,600 searches a month, $5.25 per click, transactional.

The Style transformation seekers segment has the highest cost per click (the amount advertisers pay when someone clicks on their ad), which suggests these searchers are the most ready to spend money.

This is worth a look because your site currently captures almost none of the interest from these high-value groups. A person who writes your pages could address this by creating new content for these specific audiences, and it would be a medium-sized job.

The following pages hold the site's value and must be protected before anything is optimised.

This is worth a look. You should have your web developer or the person who writes your pages check these pages to ensure they are performing as intended. This is a small job.

This is a picture of the site before any work has been done. Everything done later is judged against this picture.

Your strongest area is User Experience, which is good news because it means visitors can easily interact with your shop once they find you. Your weakest area is Off-Page SEO, which is a critical area for growth. This specific area would be handled by a marketing specialist or an SEO professional.

This situation is worth a look. Improving these areas is a big job that would require your web developer or a specialist to manage the technical and promotional changes.

AkOOre's own measurement system has tracked your site from 2026-09-04 to 2026-10-12. Your overall score (a single number representing the health of your site's visibility) was 61% then and is 67% now. The site was improving before this audit.

This upward movement is worth a look to ensure we keep the momentum going. You should discuss these trends with your web developer to see if they can help maintain this growth, which should be a small job.

The robots.txt file is a set of instructions at the door of your site that tells automated programs what they are allowed to read. Most of your instructions are set up correctly, but some specific bots are being told to stay away from certain parts of your site.

• Twitterbot — blocked: this bot helps your content appear correctly when shared on X (formerly Twitter).
• facebookexternalhit — blocked: this bot allows Facebook to see your page details when someone shares a link.
• Googlebot-Image — blocked: this bot helps your images show up in Google Image search results.

This is worth a look because you are currently preventing some social media and image tools from reading your site. You should ask your web developer to check these specific rules to ensure your content looks right when shared. This is typically a small job.

The robots.txt file is the set of rules you write to tell machines how to behave, but this table shows what your server actually did when a request knocked wearing each bot's name. It tracks whether your server let the visitor in or turned them away during our check.

AkOOre's own measurement found 95 instances where a visitor was turned away, and these are some of the most recognizable names from that group:

• DeepSeekBot — refused our test: if this AI bot cannot read your site, your products will not appear in its answers.
• Amazonbot — refused our test: if this cloud service is turned away, parts of your site's infrastructure might struggle to communicate.
• Google-InspectionTool — refused our test: if Google's inspection tool is refused, your pages may not show up correctly in search results.
• Googlebot-Image — refused our test: if this bot is turned away, the images of your art will not appear in image searches.
• Gemini-Deep-Research — refused our test: if this Google tool is blocked, your site's details won't be used for deep research queries.

There were also some visitors we could not fully track during this specific check:

• ChatGPT Operator — not measurable on this run.
• ChatGPT-User/2.0 — not measurable on this run.
• Google-Extended — not measurable on this run.
• Grok — not measurable on this run.
• GrokBot — not measurable on this run.

These refusals cannot be settled from outside, because a server that checks who a visitor really is is supposed to refuse a stranger claiming to be a famous crawler; the site's own visitor logs are what say whether the genuine ones get in.

The current state of your server's access is worth a look. If you find that real customers or important search engines are being turned away, your web developer can investigate your server settings, which is usually a small job.

A contradiction between your instructions and your server's behavior is more serious than a simple block because it means your site is actively confusing the machines that try to visit you. AkOOre's own measurement system found 99 instances where the rules say one thing but the server does another, and 2 instances where the rules say one thing but the server lets the visitor in anyway.

• scrapers — 34 of them, including Arquivo-web-crawler: this crawler cannot read the site.
• seo_tools — 20 of them: this crawler cannot read the site.
• search engines — 17 of them, including Googlebot: cannot index the site — it will not appear in results at all.
• AI assistants — 10 of them, including DeepSeekBot and ClaudeBot: cannot read the site, so it can never cite it in an answer.
• Google's own crawlers — 7 of them, including Gemini-Deep-Research and GoogleOther: this part of Google — images, video, shopping or the inspection tool — cannot see the site.
• cloud_services — 4 of them, including Amazonbot: this crawler cannot read the site.
• social_bots — 4 of them, including Twitterbot and facebookexternalhit: shared links show up as bare grey URLs.
• other crawlers — 2 of them, including TurnitinBot and archive.org_bot: this crawler cannot read the site.

This is urgent because your site is currently invisible to many of the most important tools on the internet. You should have your web developer investigate these settings immediately to ensure your shop can be found. This is likely a medium-sized job involving your server configuration and your site's instruction files.

Of the 620 URLs collected across 24 structures, 100% can enter the index and 100% pass link value on. This means that every page AkOOre found is capable of being discovered and passing its importance to other parts of your site, which is vital because the larger sections of your site carry the most weight in search results.

Your site's indexability is healthy. This is an outstanding result that means your technical instructions are working exactly as they should.

This is fine as it is. There is nothing for you or your web developer to change regarding how your pages are instructed to be indexed.

Deciding which parts of your site should or should not appear in search results is a common part of managing a website, and this table looks at whether these exclusions were intentional or mistakes.

You should ask your web developer to check every row marked as "to verify" to ensure these pages were not hidden by mistake.

This is worth a look because many of your main content areas are currently being kept out of search engines. A web developer can fix this relatively easily if these settings were accidental.

AkOOre's own measurement system found that your site's instructions for search engines are not always in agreement. When these instructions conflict, the search engine follows the most restrictive rule to decide which pages to show in search results.

• STRUCTURE (2 URLs): / and /en/*/list/ have contradictions — the search engine will follow the most restrictive instruction to decide which pages to show.

This is worth a look to ensure your most important pages are being seen correctly. Your web developer can resolve these small technical disagreements quite easily.

A sitemap (a table of contents that you hand to search engines to help them find your pages) was found and is readable. It lists 480 URL(s) (web addresses) across the pages we read.

The 633 unique URL(s) AkOOre has found so far is not the total size of your site. There are 16,033 sitemap file(s) found, 100 were read, and they point to an estimated 646,345 URL(s) in total.

The sitemap declares only part of the site, with 480 of 633 unique URL(s) are declared in the sitemap; the pages it leaves out depend on links to be found at all.

This is worth a look for your web developer. It is a relatively small job to ensure all your important pages are included in that list.

167 of the 633 unique URLs AkOOre tracked for your site were found by following links but are missing from your sitemap (the file that acts as a table of contents for search engines) — so these pages are not being explicitly announced to search engines.

• /en/articles/show/*/ — 14 URLs found by browsing, none declared.
• /en/*/ — 12 URLs found by browsing, none declared.
• /en/orders/photo-to-painting/*/ — 10 URLs found by browsing, none declared.
• /en/artists/*/ — 8 URLs found by browsing, none declared.
• /en/articles/groupby/*/ — 7 URLs found by browsing, none declared.

Add these missing URLs to the sitemap unless they are meant to be hidden, in which case they should be properly excluded from your site's navigation.

This is worth a look to ensure your most important content is being discovered. You should ask your web developer to update the sitemap file, which should be a relatively small job.

Speed is measured the way a search engine measures it, on a phone, and a slow page loses visitors before they read the first word. When pages take too long to load, people often leave your site immediately.

The page with the worst performance is /ja/art/sir-joshua-reynolds-to-masu-taiku-akurantoqing-1722nian-1785nian-di-7dai-lu-jun-shi-guan-yi-yuan-arjdpn-ja/PrintReproduction/.

This situation is worth a look because most of the pages we checked are not loading as fast as they should. Your web developer can address this, and it will likely be a medium-sized job to improve these scores across your site.

/ scores 55/100 for speed.

1. Avoid multiple page redirects (saves ≈0.9 s) - a technical fix for the developer (Avoid multiple page redirects (saves ≈0.9 s)).
2. Reduce unused CSS (saves ≈0.2 s) - the page ships styling it never uses (Reduce unused CSS (saves ≈0.2 s)).
3. Reduce unused JavaScript — Est savings of 137 KiB - the page ships code it never runs (Reduce unused JavaScript — Est savings of 137 KiB).

This is worth a look because the page feels slow and unresponsive to visitors. You should share these details with your web developer to address these issues. It is likely a medium-sized job for them to clean up these technical delays.

/en/art-auction/ scores score 96 / 100 for speed.

1. the page ships code it never runs - saves ≈0.3 s (Reduce unused JavaScript)
2. the page ships styling it never uses - saves ≈0.1 s (Reduce unused CSS)

This is worth a look because your page is currently very fast, but there are small ways to make it even better. You should hand these notes to your web developer to see if they can make these quick adjustments. It should be a small job for them to handle.

/en/orders/photo-to-painting/corporate/ scores 57/100 for speed.

1. the page ships styling it never uses - saves ≈0.3 s (Reduce unused CSS)
2. the page ships code it never runs - Est savings of 137 KiB (Reduce unused JavaScript)

This is worth a look because the page feels slow and unresponsive when people try to use it. You should send these details to your web developer to handle this as a medium-sized job.

/en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/ scores score 70 / 100 for speed.

1. Use efficient cache lifetimes (saves ≈1.9 s) - a technical fix for the developer (Use efficient cache lifetimes).
2. Render-blocking requests (saves ≈1.6 s) - code loads before the content and makes the visitor wait (Render-blocking requests).
3. Reduce unused CSS (saves ≈0.5 s) - the page ships styling it never uses (Reduce unused CSS).

This is worth a look because the main content takes 15.17 s to appear, which is much slower than it should be. You should share these details with your web developer to address this. It is likely a medium-sized job for them to fix.

/en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/ scores 64/100 for speed.

1. the page ships styling it never uses - saves ≈0.3 s (Reduce unused CSS)
2. the page ships code it never runs - saves ≈0.3 s (Reduce unused JavaScript)

This is worth a look because the main content takes 13.60 s to appear, which is very slow and might cause visitors to leave before they see your work. You should have your web developer look into these specific speed improvements. It is likely a medium-sized job for a professional.

These are developer changes; none of them touches the page's content.

A canonical tag (the instruction you give to search engines to tell them which version of a page is the master copy) is a page's own statement of which address is the original. When a page points to a different address instead of itself, it gives its ranking power away to that other page.

100% of the 1 structures AkOOre tracked for your site are self-canonical.

Every measured structure claims its own addresses — no ranking is being given away.

This is fine as it is. No action is needed from you or your web developer regarding this specific issue.

On the page /, AkOOre's own measurement system found structured data (code that tells search engines exactly what your content is) including AggregateRating, EntryPoint, ImageObject, Organization, SearchAction, WebPage, and WebSite.

• The page has structured data (AggregateRating, EntryPoint, ImageObject, Organization, SearchAction) but none of it says what the page actually IS.
• Add a 'BreadcrumbList' description block matching the page's position in your site (e.g. Home > Oil paintings > This page).

This is worth a look for your web developer to fix.

On /en/art-auction/, the page uses structured data (code that tells search engines exactly what your content represents) including AggregateRating, Answer, BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, EntryPoint, FAQPage, HowTo, HowToStep, ImageObject, ItemList, ListItem, Offer, Organization, Product, Question, SearchAction, WebPage, and WebSite. Everything is working perfectly on this page.

This is fine as it is and requires no action from your web developer.

On /en/orders/photo-to-painting/corporate/, the page uses structured data (code that tells search engines exactly what your content means) including AggregateRating, BreadcrumbList, EntryPoint, HowTo, HowToStep, ImageObject, ListItem, Organization, SearchAction, Service, WebPage, and WebSite. Everything is working perfectly on this page.

This is fine as it is and requires no action from your web developer.

On /en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/, the page uses structured data (code that tells search engines exactly what your content means) including AggregateRating, BreadcrumbList, EntryPoint, HowTo, HowToStep, ImageObject, ListItem, Organization, SearchAction, Service, WebPage, and WebSite. Everything is working perfectly on this page.

This is fine as it is and requires no action from your web developer.

On /en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/, the page carries AggregateRating, BreadcrumbList, EntryPoint, ImageObject, ListItem, Organization, SearchAction, and WebSite structured data (code that tells search engines exactly what your content is).

• The page has structured data (AggregateRating, BreadcrumbList, EntryPoint, ImageObject, ListItem) but none of it says what the page actually IS.

This is worth a look for your web developer to fix.

On the page /, AkOOre's own measurement system found that across the pages we read, 3,627 pages are in English, 4 are in Russian, 4 are in French, 4 are in Chinese, 3 are in Korean, 3 are in Estonian, 3 are in Czech, 2 are in Bulgarian, 2 are in Polish, 1 is in Spanish, 1 is in Serbian, 1 is in Danish, 1 is in Turkish, 1 is in Slovak, 1 is in Japanese, 1 is in Lithuanian, 1 is in Swedish, 1 is in German, 1 is in Slovenian, and 5 pages carry no recorded language at all. This page also uses 33 hreflang links (instructions that tell search engines which language version to show different users) to point to other language versions of your content.

Because this page uses many different language links, search engines must guess which version of your site to show to different people around the world. If these links are incorrect, a visitor might be shown a version of your site in a language they do not understand.

This is fine as it is and does not require action from your web developer.

On the page /en/art-auction/, AkOOre's own measurement system found that across the pages we read, the languages recorded are en (3,627 pages), (not set) (5 pages with no recorded language at all), ru (4 pages), fr (4 pages), zh (4 pages), ko (3 pages), et (3 pages), cs (3 pages), bg (2 pages), pl (2 pages), es (1 page), sr (1 page), da (1 page), tr (1 page), sk (1 page), ja (1 page), lt (1 page), sv (1 page), de (1 page), and sl (1 page). This specific page has 33 hreflang links (tags that tell search engines which language version to show) to other language versions of your content.

Because this page has many different language versions linked together, search engines can easily understand which version to show to people in different countries. This is fine as it is.

This is fine as it is.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/corporate/, AkOOre's own measurement system found that across the pages we read, the languages recorded are en (3,627 pages), (not set) (5 pages with no recorded language at all), ru (4 pages), fr (4 pages), zh (4 pages), ko (3 pages), et (3 pages), cs (3 pages), bg (2 pages), pl (2 pages), es (1 page), sr (1 page), da (1 page), tr (1 page), sk (1 page), ja (1 page), lt (1 page), sv (1 page), de (1 page), and sl (1 page). This specific page has 0 hreflang links (tags that tell search engines which language version to show) to other language versions of itself.

Because this page only uses one language and has no alternate links, it is fine as it is. This setup is correct because there are no other versions of this page for a visitor to be sent to instead.

This is fine as it is.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/, AkOOre's own measurement system found that the 3,669 pages AkOOre tracks for your site are recorded in English (3,627 pages), Russian (4 pages), French (4 pages), Chinese (4 pages), Korean (3 pages), Estonian (3 pages), Czech (3 pages), Bulgarian (2 pages), Polish (2 pages), Spanish (1 page), Serbian (1 page), Danish (1 page), Turkish (1 page), Slovak (1 page), Japanese (1 page), Lithuanian (1 page), Swedish (1 page), German (1 page), and Slovenian (1 page), while 5 pages carry no recorded language at all. This specific page has 0 hreflang links (the code that tells search engines which language version to show different users) to other language versions of itself.

Because this page only uses one language and has no alternate links, it is fine as it is. This setup is correct because there are no other language versions of this specific page for a visitor to be confused by.

This is fine as it is.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/, AkOOre's own measurement system shows that across the pages we read, the languages recorded are en (3,627 pages), ru (4 pages), fr (4 pages), zh (4 pages), ko (3 pages), et (3 pages), cs (3 pages), bg (2 pages), pl (2 pages), es (1 page), sr (1 page), da (1 page), tr (1 page), sk (1 page), ja (1 page), lt (1 page), sv (1 page), de (1 page), sl (1 page), and 5 pages carry no recorded language at all. This specific page has 0 hreflang links (tags that tell search engines which language version to show different users).

Since this page only uses one language and has no alternate links, this is fine and alternate links are unnecessary. This setup ensures there is no confusion for search engines or AI assistants.

This is fine as it is.

AkOOre's own measurement system checked if the text on / is delivered as server-rendered content (the actual words and sentences that are part of the page's initial code sent to a browser) or if it only appears after the browser runs extra code. For this page, the text is delivered as server-rendered content, which is a good result. This means both search engines and AI assistants read this page's content directly.

This is fine as it is. You do not need to take any action regarding how this text is delivered.

AkOOre's own measurement system checked if the text on /en/art-auction/ is delivered as part of the page's initial code or if it only appears after the browser runs extra instructions. This page uses server-rendered content (text that is built into the page's code on your web server before it is sent to the visitor), which is a good result. Because the text is delivered this way, both search engines and AI assistants read this page's content directly.

This is fine as it is. You do not need to take any action regarding how this page's text is delivered.

AkOOre's own measurement system checked if the text on /en/orders/photo-to-painting/corporate/ is server-rendered (meaning the text is part of the initial code sent to the browser) or if it only appears after the browser runs extra code. The result for this page is good, as ~2018 words are server-rendered in the HTML. This means both search engines and AI assistants read this page's content directly.

This is fine as it is. You do not need to take any action regarding how this text is delivered.

AkOOre's own measurement system checked if the text on /en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/ is server-rendered (meaning the text is part of the initial page code sent to the browser) or if it only appears after the browser runs extra code. The result for this page is good, as ~2025 words are server-rendered in the HTML. This means both search engines and AI assistants read this page's content directly.

This is fine as it is. You do not need to take any action regarding how this text is delivered.

AkOOre's own measurement system checked if the text on /en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/ is delivered as part of the page's initial code or if it only appears after the browser runs extra instructions. This page is in good shape because the text is server-rendered (meaning the text is sent as part of the page's basic structure rather than being built by the browser later). Because of this, both search engines and AI assistants read this page's content directly.

This is fine as it is. You do not need to take any action regarding how this text is delivered.

A website is not thousands of separate decisions but a dozen templates repeated, and this is the shape of this one. AkOOre's own measurement found 620 URLs collected (sample) across 24 URL structures (the repeating patterns used to create your web pages).

The five biggest shapes are not clean overall due to several instances of unclean naming.

This is worth a look for your web developer. Fixing these naming patterns is a small job that will help keep your site organized.

Of the 10 shapes shown, 8 carry the verdict HEALTHY. The single non-healthy shape that covers the most URLs is /en/articles/show/*/, which has 14 pages.

This is worth a look. Your web developer could handle this as a small job to ensure your content is fully visible to search engines. It is important to make sure your most important pages are not being hidden from the systems that find them.

A menu link says a page exists, a contextual link says it matters, and the report measured both for the pages that earn. 10 of the 12 valuable pages have no contextual link at all, 2 of the 12 valuable pages have three or more contextual links, and 7 valuable pages are held up by the menu or footer alone.

The site's strongest pages should link to these from their content — free authority, about one editor-day of work.

This is worth a look because your most important pages are not being properly connected through your actual content. You should have whoever writes your pages add these links, which is a small job.

The words on a link, known as anchor text (the clickable words used to connect one page to another), tell both robots and readers what is at the other end, and 'click here' tells them nothing. AkOOre's own measurement system found that 0 of the 0 contextual links examined carry descriptive words.

• Descriptive words: 0 of 0
• Generic or empty words: 0 of 0
• Bare addresses: 0 of 0

This measurement is still being collected — this subsection will fill in by itself.

AkOOre's own measurement system tracks where your search traffic (the visitors who find you through search engines like Google) actually lands on your site.

• /sk/articles/illuminating-the-enlightenment-art-sociopolitical-context-of-the-18th-century-en/ — 0.46 organic ETV (estimated traffic visits) per month

This concentration is dangerously concentrated. One lost ranking on one page would take most of the site's traffic with it.

This situation is urgent and worth a look. You or whoever writes your pages should focus on creating more high-quality content to spread your visitors across more addresses. This would be a big job involving regular writing and updates.

Every link on a page splits the authority it passes, so a site whose links sit mostly in its menus and footers hands its authority to the template.

• The top 10 pages hold 5% of the site's internal authority (good)
• 86% of the 195,438 internal links are boilerplate (bad)
• 0 internal links are marked nofollow (good)

Trimming the sitewide blocks to the pages that earn is one template change that raises every contextual link.

This is worth a look. Your web developer could handle this by cleaning up your menus and footers, which is a relatively small job.

Some websites let visitors narrow a list — 'red only', 'under 50 euros', 'newest first' — and every combination quietly becomes its own web address. A big shop can end up with thousands of addresses showing almost the same things, and search engines spend their time on those instead of on the pages you actually want found.

That is not happening here: no group of addresses on your site is multiplying that way.

AkOOre sorts the pages it tracks for this site into different kinds to see how your content is spread out. The list below counts all of them from the 3,665 pages AkOOre reads, which is a sample of what we found and not the total size of your entire site.

• not sorted into a kind yet — 2,681 pages, which are read and stored but have simply not been classified
• article — 478 pages
• buy — 396 pages
• offers_list — 75 pages
• landing — 24 pages
• lead_magnet — 11 pages

The portfolio's shape matches the market's demand. Your current balance of informative and sales-focused pages aligns well with what people are searching for.

This is fine as it is. There is no urgent need for change, but if you ever want to expand your reach, your web developer or content writer could help you build more specific pages as a small or medium task.

This section looks at the health of the most important pages on your site by averaging their individual reports. AkOOre's own estimation system shows an average on-page health score of 71%.

Most critical issues repeat across pages (missing description, no structured data, no H1). Fix them in your template or theme once, and they disappear everywhere at the same time.

This is worth a look because your quality score has dropped slightly. Since many issues are repetitive, your web developer can likely fix them all at once by updating your site's template, which makes this a relatively small job.

AkOOre's own estimation system scored every page AkOOre tracks for your site to see which ones have the most potential to bring in customers. The following list shows the top 10 pages of the 227 pages AkOOre tracks for your site that are worth your attention.

9 of the 10 pages shown in this table are not being promoted yet.

This is worth a look because many of your most valuable pages are currently sitting idle. You should have your web developer or the person who writes your pages look into activating these to help capture more customers. This is likely a medium-sized job to get everything running.

For the page https://originaluniqueart.com/, the title tag (the text that appears in blue as a clickable link on a search results page) and the meta description (the short summary of your page that appears under the link in search results) act as your advertisement on the results page and are often the only thing a searcher reads.

• FINDING — fix: The page already has og:title, og:description, so shared previews partly work — but og:image is still missing, and a preview without an image is what costs the most clicks: chat apps and social feeds show image-less links as a bare grey line. Complete the set in the page's <head> — most site platforms and SEO plugins can fill these automatically.

This is worth a look to ensure your social media posts look professional. Your web developer can fix this easily as it is a small job.

On the page /en/art-auction/, the title and description act as your advertisement on search results pages and are often the only thing a person reads before deciding to click. This is your chance to convince them to visit your site.

• FINDING — Meta description: The description is 217 characters. Google has no fixed limit — snippets are trimmed by width, which depends on the device and the query, and are often rewritten — but about 150-160 characters usually shows in full. Nothing to fix as long as the strongest selling points sit in the first 150 characters; the tail may be cut on some screens.
• Ready to paste — title: Online Art Auctions | Bid on Original Paintings; description: Bid on one-of-a-kind paintings starting at $1. No buyer's premium or hidden fees—you only pay your winning bid plus shipping. Free to join and bid.

This is worth a look to ensure your most important selling points are seen immediately. You or whoever writes your pages can handle this by updating the text in the page's head section, which is a small job.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/corporate/, the title tag (the headline that appears in search results) and the meta description (the short summary shown under the headline in search results) act as your advertisement on the results page and are often the only thing a searcher reads.

• FINDING — fix: The title is 77 characters. Google has no fixed limit — it trims by width, which varies by device, and often rewrites the headline — but around 60 characters usually shows in full. Nothing to fix as long as the words people search for come first; the tail may be cut on some screens.
• FINDING — fix: The page already has og:title, og:description, so shared previews partly work — but og:image is still missing, and a preview without an image is what costs the most clicks: chat apps and social feeds show image-less links as a bare grey line. Complete the set in the page's <head> — most site platforms and SEO plugins can fill these automatically.

This is worth a look because missing images in social media previews can make your links look broken or unappealing to potential customers. Your web developer can fix this by adding the missing image tags, and it should be a small job.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/, the title tag (the headline that appears in search results) and the meta description (the short summary shown under the headline in search results) act as your advertisement on the results page and are often the only thing a searcher reads.

• FINDING — fix: The title is 84 characters. Google has no fixed limit — it trims by width, which varies by device, and often rewrites the headline — but around 60 characters usually shows in full. Nothing to fix as long as the words people search for come first; the tail may be cut on some screens.
• FINDING — fix: The page already has og:title, og:description, so shared previews partly work — but og:image is still missing, and a preview without an image is what costs the most clicks: chat apps and social feeds show image-less links as a bare grey line. Complete the set in the page's <head> — most site platforms and SEO plugins can fill these automatically.

This is worth a look because your social media previews are missing a visual element. Your web developer can fix this by adding an image tag to the page's code, which is a small job.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/, the title and description act as your advertisement on the search results page and are often the only thing a searcher reads. This is the text that appears when someone looks for your services in a search engine.

• FINDING — Open Graph tags (the code that tells social media apps which image to show when your link is shared) are missing an og:image, which means chat apps and social feeds show image-less links as a bare grey line instead of a picture.
• Ready to paste — title: "Innovate Your Space With Art - Custom Paintings"; description: "Custom paintings that capture your vision, team, and ideas in motion. Elevate your office environment with motivational artwork that inspires innovation, cultur"

This is worth a look to ensure your links look professional when shared. Your web developer can fix the missing image tag easily, and it is a small job.

For the page https://originaluniqueart.com/, the structure should read like a well-outlined document: one title, ordered sections, and enough text.

• 40 heading(s) with 6 H2, levels skipped — harder for machines to outline the page — fix: Fix the skipped levels in your editor's heading dropdown so the outline reads logically.
• 8.6% (18186 text bytes / 212086 HTML bytes) — not enough substance to rank or to be quoted — fix: add more real text content to the page (the easy win), and/or ask your developer to slim the page down (remove unused scripts and styling).

This is worth a look. You should ask your web developer to look at the code and your writer to add more text. These are relatively small jobs.

On the page /en/art-auction/, the structure should read like a well-outlined document: one title, ordered sections, and enough text.

• Heading hierarchy — harder for machines to outline the page — fix: Fix the skipped levels in your editor's heading dropdown so the outline reads logically.
• Text-to-HTML ratio — not enough substance to rank or to be quoted — fix: add more real text content to the page (the easy win), and/or ask your developer to slim the page down (remove unused scripts and styling).

This is worth a look. You should ask whoever writes your pages to add more text and have your web developer clean up the code. These are relatively small jobs.

The page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/corporate/ should read like a well-outlined document: one title, ordered sections, and enough text.

• 71 heading(s), 3 H2, levels skipped — harder for machines to outline the page — fix: Fix the skipped levels in your editor's heading dropdown so the outline reads logically.
• 5.3% (12259 text bytes / 230267 HTML bytes) — not enough substance to rank or to be quoted — fix: add more real text content to the page (the easy win), and/or ask your developer to slim the page down (remove unused scripts and styling).

This is worth a look. You should ask your web developer to slim down the code and your writer to add more text to the page. This is a medium-sized job.

For the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/, the structure should read like a well-outlined document: one title, ordered sections, and enough text.

• 71 heading(s), 3 H2, levels skipped — harder for machines to outline the page — fix: Fix the skipped levels in your editor's heading dropdown so the outline reads logically.
• 5.3% (12141 text bytes / 230025 HTML bytes) — not enough substance to rank or to be quoted — fix: add more real text content to the page (the easy win), and/or ask your developer to slim the page down (remove unused scripts and styling).

This is worth a look. You can address the heading order yourself in your website editor, but you should ask your web developer to help with slimming down the page code. These are relatively small jobs.

For the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/, the structure should read like a well-outlined document: one title, ordered sections, and enough text.

• 73 heading(s) with 2 H2 and levels skipped — harder for machines to outline the page — fix: Fix the skipped levels in your editor's heading dropdown so the outline reads logically.
• 5.6% text-to-HTML ratio — not enough substance to rank or to be quoted — fix: add more real text content to the page (the easy win), and/or ask your developer to slim the page down (remove unused scripts and styling).

This is worth a look. You should ask your web developer to slim down the code and your content writer to add more text to the page. These are relatively small jobs.

On the page /, AkOOre's own measurement system looked at how your images are set up. Alt text (the written description of an image that helps search engines and AI assistants understand what is in a picture) is present for 130 of the 130 images AkOOre tracks for your site. However, 115 of the 130 images do not declare their width and height (the specific size instructions that tell a browser how much space to save for a picture before it appears), which causes the page to jump around while it loads. Ask your developer to add width and height attributes to those image tags too (or update the site's image component to do it everywhere automatically), so the page stops jumping entirely.

This is worth a look because a jumping page can be frustrating for your visitors. Your web developer can fix this, and it should be a relatively small job.

On the /en/art-auction/ page, we looked at how your images are set up. Alt text (a written description of an image that helps search engines and digital assistants understand what is in a picture) is missing from 1 of the 16 images AkOOre tracked on this page. Additionally, 1 of the 16 images lacks declared width and height (instructions that tell the browser how much space to save for a picture before it appears, which prevents the page from jumping around while it loads). To fix the loading speed, you should ask your developer to enable modern image formats like WebP or AVIF, which keep the same visual quality at a fraction of the file size.

This is worth a look to ensure your site stays fast and easy for everyone to use. Your web developer can handle these technical adjustments, and it should be a small job.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/corporate/, we looked at how your images are set up. Alt text (a written description of an image that helps search engines and AI assistants understand what is in a picture) is missing from 19 of the 94 images AkOOre tracks for your site. Additionally, 78 of the 94 images do not declare their width and height, which means the page layout will jump around while it loads. You should ask your developer to add width and height attributes to those image tags too (or update the site's image component to do it everywhere automatically), so the page stops jumping entirely.

This is worth a look because it affects how smoothly your site feels to visitors. Your web developer can fix these layout jumps and the missing descriptions, and it should be a relatively small job.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/, we looked at how your images are set up. Alt text (the written description of an image that helps search engines and AI assistants understand what is in a picture) is missing from 19 of the 94 images AkOOre tracks for your site. Additionally, 78 of the 94 images do not declare their width and height, which means the page layout will jump around while the images load. You should ask your developer to add width and height attributes to those image tags so the page stops jumping entirely.

This is worth a look because it affects how smoothly your site feels to visitors. Your web developer can fix the sizing issues and the image formats relatively easily, making it a small to medium job.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/, we looked at how your images are set up. Alt text (a written description of an image that helps search engines and AI assistants understand what is in a picture) is missing from 58 of the 103 images AkOOre tracked for your site. Additionally, 78 of the 103 images do not declare their width and height, which causes the page to jump around while it loads. You should ask your developer to add width and height attributes to those image tags so the page stops jumping entirely.

This is worth a look because it affects how well your site is understood by search engines and how smooth it feels to visitors. Your web developer can likely fix the sizing issues quickly, while your site editor can handle the text descriptions over time.

On the page https://originaluniqueart.com/, you have declared 5 specific search terms (the phrases you want to show up for when people use Google) that you intend to win. However, AkOOre's own measurement shows that none of these 5 targets actually appear in the top 100 results on Google, meaning your current page content is not yet visible for the terms you have chosen.

• ABSENT — DECLARED BUT INVISIBLE — RE-TARGET OR REWRITE
• “canvas art” — position ABSENT, difficulty 96
• “famous artists” — position ABSENT, difficulty 5
• “hand-painted art reproductions” — position ABSENT, difficulty N/A
• “museum-quality artworks” — position ABSENT, difficulty N/A
• “oil paintings” — position ABSENT, difficulty 10

This situation is worth a look because your current targets are not matching what your page actually achieves. You should have whoever writes your pages review these terms to find easier, more specific phrases to target, which is a relatively small job.

On the page /en/art-auction/, AkOOre's own measurement system found that no meta keywords (the specific words you tell search engines this page is about) have been declared. Because there are no declared targets, we cannot compare what you intended to win against what is actually happening in search results.

This is fine as it is, though it is worth a look to ensure your most important topics are being captured. If you want to start declaring these targets, your web developer or the person who writes your pages can do this as a small job.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/corporate/, you have declared five specific search terms that you want this page to win. AkOOre's own measurement shows that none of these terms are actually being met by the page's current performance.

• ABSENT — DECLARED BUT INVISIBLE — RE-TARGET OR REWRITE
• employee recognition art — position ABSENT, difficulty 6/100
• hand-painted portrait — position ABSENT, difficulty 6/100
• one of a kind gift — position ABSENT, difficulty 6/100
• corporate gift — position ABSENT, difficulty 6
• oil portrait from photo — position ABSENT, difficulty 5

This situation is worth a look because your intended goals and your actual visibility are completely disconnected. You should have whoever writes your pages review these terms to see if they need to be more specific or if the page needs more content to match them. This is a medium-sized job for a content writer.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/, you have declared 5 specific search terms that you want to win, which are “art from your photo”, “children portrait”, “family portrait art”, “hand-painted oil”, and “one of a kind art”. AkOOre's own measurement shows that none of these searches are currently being met by this page in the Google top 100, which is the list of the first 100 results a search engine shows for a query.

• ABSENT — DECLARED BUT INVISIBLE — RE-TARGET OR REWRITE
• art from your photo — position N/A, difficulty N/A
• children portrait — position N/A, difficulty N/A
• family portrait art — position N/A, difficulty 0
• hand-painted oil — position N/A, difficulty N/A
• one of a kind art — position N/A, difficulty N/A

This situation is urgent because your page is currently invisible for the very things you want it to be known for. You should have whoever writes your pages look at this to better align your text with what customers actually type. This is a medium-sized job to fix the way your content matches your goals.

On the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/, you have declared 5 specific search terms (the phrases you want to show up for when people search) that you intend to win. However, AkOOre's own measurement shows that none of these 5 searches are actually being met by this page's current performance.

• ABSENT — declared but invisible — re-target or rewrite
• creative workspace — position N/A, difficulty 0
• modern office art — position N/A, difficulty 0
• startup branding — position N/A, difficulty 0
• motivational painting — position N/A, difficulty 10
• wall decor — position N/A, difficulty 21

This situation is worth a look because your current targets are not appearing in search results at all. You should have whoever writes your pages review these terms to see if they need to be more specific or if the page content needs to be updated. This is generally a medium-sized job for a content writer.

No target is being captured by the wrong page — each declared search is answered by the page that claims it.

Each entry below represents a search term that competitors are already turning into traffic while your site does not appear at all — demand proven by somebody else's results, which makes these the safest content bets available. These are opportunities where you can capture interest that is currently being handed to others.

Each row represents one page to write, and the order above is the writing order.

This is worth a look for your business. You should have whoever writes your pages create content around these topics, and it would be a big job to cover all of them.

No two pages of the site compete for the same search — every search has one clear owner.

Winnable value is the monthly worth of the searches where competitors collect customers and your site is absent — this is measured demand, priced at what advertisers pay for those clicks. This represents money left on the table because your site does not yet appear in these specific search results.

• Personalized gift seekers — about $1,297,497.50 per month winnable, across 398,390 searches per month currently going elsewhere.
• Residential interior decorators — about $761,977.00 per month winnable, across 360,310 searches per month currently going elsewhere.
• Style transformation seekers — about $543,208.01 per month winnable, across 102,600 searches per month currently going elsewhere.

These three segments are where content investment recovers real money first.

This is worth a look because there is significant interest in these areas that your site is not yet capturing. If you decide to pursue these groups, the person who writes your pages would need to take on a large job to create enough new material to compete.

Search engines and AI assistants decide whether you are a real, identifiable business by cross-checking what every page and profile declares, so having one name, one address, and one identity everywhere is the whole game. AkOOre's own measurement shows that your organization is declared as originaluniqueart.com on 6 of the 6 pages AkOOre tracks for your site. However, your branded search demand—which is how often people specifically search for your business name—is currently at 0% of the sample's organic visits.

• artshopreviews.com is the only official profile (sameAs) [the list of social media or external links that prove you are who you say you are] declared on 6 of the 6 pages AkOOre tracks for your site.

To fix:

• Add your full contact block, including a phone number, physical address, and company or VAT number, to your footer so it appears on every page.
• Create a Team page [a page that lists the people behind the business with their names and photos] and link it from your footer.
• Add an author name, a short bio, and a visible date to your content so readers and machines know who wrote the text and when.
• Either publish the actual text of your reviews on the page or remove the rating declarations from /, /en/art-auction/,, and /en/orders/photo-to-painting/coco to ensure your review markup [the hidden code that tells a machine what your star rating is] is honest.

This is worth a look because your current setup makes it difficult for machines to verify you are a legitimate company. A web developer or the person who writes your pages can fix these issues, and most of these tasks are small jobs.

This subsection focuses on the trust signals found on https://originaluniqueart.com/.

The page is missing author and date signals, which means content nobody signs is content machines trust less and neither readers nor assistants can tell whether this is current. It also lacks individual review markup, meaning stars without reviews behind them can hurt instead of help.

This is worth a look to ensure your business appears as credible as possible to search engines and AI. A person who writes your pages or your web developer can fix these issues, and it should be a small job.

This analysis focuses on the page /en/art-auction/.

The page is missing author and date signals, which means content nobody signs is content machines trust less and neither readers nor assistants can tell whether this is current. It also lacks individual review markup, meaning stars without reviews behind them can hurt instead of help.

This is worth a look to improve how much machines trust your brand. Your web developer or the person who writes your pages can fix these issues, and it should be a small job.

This analysis focuses on the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/corporate/.

The page lacks author and date signals, meaning content nobody signs is content machines trust less and neither readers nor assistants can tell whether this is current. It also has ratings with no visible reviews, which means stars without reviews behind them can hurt instead of help.

This is worth a look to ensure your business appears as credible as possible to search engines. Your web developer or the person who writes your pages could fix these issues, and it should be a relatively small job.

This analysis focuses on the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/.

The page lacks author and date signals, meaning content nobody signs is content machines trust less and neither readers nor assistants can tell whether this is current. It also has ratings with no visible reviews, which means stars without reviews behind them can hurt instead of help.

This is worth a look to ensure your business appears as credible as possible to search engines. Your web developer or the person who writes your pages can fix these issues, and it should be a relatively small job.

This analysis focuses on the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/.

The page is missing author and date signals, which means content nobody signs is content machines trust less and neither readers nor assistants can tell whether this is current. It also lacks individual review markup, meaning stars without reviews behind them can hurt instead of help.

This is worth a look to improve how much machines trust your brand. Your web developer or the person who writes your pages can fix these issues, and it should be a small job.

Backlinks (links from other websites that vouch for yours) act as a form of digital currency that builds your site's authority, and AkOOre's own measurement system recorded your treasury on 2026-06-18.

An unusual mix, worth a look.

This is worth a look because you have many broken pages that are currently losing the value of the links pointing to them. Your web developer can fix this by setting up redirects, which is a relatively small job.

8 of the 8 toxic links AkOOre's own estimation system identified are from spammy places, and these scored worst.

• m9ufa.com — risk score 75
• bestnz-poker-casinoslot.com — risk score 70
• betwinnermirror.com — risk score 70
• fashionclothingnews.com — risk score 70
• homesforsaleoldgreenwichct.com — risk score 70
• kernelpanicpodcast.com — risk score 70
• plumeriamarketing.com — risk score 70
• seonix.agency — risk score 70

Every incoming link lands on a working page — no authority is being wasted.

This is worth a look. You should have your web developer review these specific links to ensure they do not negatively impact your site's reputation. This is generally a small job.

Your site has 200 power links (high-quality connections from other websites that act as a vote of confidence for your business) that are significantly stronger than the average link.

Losing one of these high-strength connections would matter more than gaining ten average links.

This is a very strong position for your site to be in. It is worth a look to ensure these relationships stay active. You should have your web developer check that these links remain functional, which is a small job.

Beyond counting links, machines weigh WHO vouches — an institution, an encyclopedia, the press, a review platform and a community each carry a different kind of trust, and AI assistants lean on exactly these when they choose what to cite. These sources act as digital endorsements that tell search engines and AI assistants that your business is a real, reliable entity.

• Institutional & educational links: none yet
• Knowledge bases (Wikipedia & co): none yet
• Press & media citations: fashionclothingnews.com, theforbestimes.com
• Review platforms: none yet
• Communities & social platforms: none yet

The gaps in your reputation are institutional links, knowledge base references, review platform links, and community platform links.

Your current reputation is worth a look because you lack the diverse endorsements that build long-term authority. Building these connections is a long-term project for whoever writes your pages or manages your public relations, and it will require consistent effort over many months rather than a single quick fix.

Every website here already links to businesses like this one, so it has proven it will, which makes this the warmest outreach list that exists for this market.

Work the list from the top.

This is fine as it is because you are already appearing on all the major surfaces that cover your market. If you wanted to expand your reach, your web developer could help you manage new profiles, but this is a very small job.

Your competitors are not just the companies you discussed in a meeting; they are any site that search engines place alongside yours when people look for art. Some names in the list below might seem unfamiliar, but these are often the sites that capture the most potential buyers. We use a similarity score (a measurement of how closely another site's products and customers match your own) to separate true rivals from accidental neighbours who simply share similar words on their pages.

Only the direct rivals justify spending money on marketing, because trying to outrank an accidental neighbour only brings in visitors who were never going to buy your specific art.

This part of your report is worth a look once we have more data. As AkOOre's system gathers more information about these 8 of the 91 domains we track, you or your web developer can decide if you need to adjust your strategy based on who is truly competing for your customers.

Your authority (the mass of links and reputation behind every ranking attempt) is 236/1000, which is below the competitor median of 323/1000. This means you are starting these digital battles with less weight than the average rival in your market.

47 rivals are within reach today: academyfinepaintings.com, timebite.org, americanbronze.com. Link building has to come first, or content will stall under stronger domains.

This situation is worth a look because you are currently trailing the field. You should have your content writer and a link-building specialist work together on this, as it will be a big job to close this gap.

On the searches both sides rank for, here is the honest score: No head-to-head comparison stored yet. The list below is the cheapest traffic in this audit because the page already exists and already ranks — it only needs a push.

A few positions on one of these is worth more than a new page, for a fraction of the effort.

This is worth a look. You should have your page writer review these specific topics to see if they can bridge the gap. This is generally a small job for someone who already manages your content.

AkOOre's own measurement system has identified 6 different market segments that represent the total demand for your type of business. This includes various groups of people looking for art, as well as areas where your site does not yet appear in search results.

The website www.artfinder.com currently leads the largest segment of the market.

This situation is worth a look because your site is missing out on almost all the available interest in these major categories. A person who writes your pages could begin addressing this with a medium-sized project to target these specific groups.

The ranked share counts the searches your site ranks for anywhere in the first hundred results, while the click-weighted share (the portion of clicks your site actually captures based on how high you appear) counts only the clicks those positions actually capture. A wide gap between these two numbers means your site is present but not really seen because a result on page two is worth almost nothing.

In the Scarcity-seeking collectors segment, your site appears without being seen because the positions exist but the clicks do not. In all other segments shown, the two shares agree perfectly as they are both zero.

This is worth a look because you have found a small foothold in one area that isn't yet bringing people to your shop. Improving this would be a medium-sized job for whoever writes your pages to help move those rankings higher up the list.

AkOOre's own measurement shows several pieces of the market where your site ranks for almost nothing, meaning this demand is being handed over in full to other businesses that are currently collecting it. These segments represent gaps (areas where people are searching for specific things but your site does not appear in the results) that you are not yet reaching.

• Art history enthusiasts — 825,990 searches per month, currently owned by www.artfinder.com, about $519,741.40 per month winnable.
• Personalized gift seekers — 398,390 searches per month, currently owned by www.instapainting.com, about $1,297,497.50 per month winnable.
• Residential interior decorators — 360,310 searches per month, currently owned by eleanosgallery.com, about $761,977.00 per month winnable.
• Scarcity-seeking collectors — 182,470 searches per month, currently owned by www.artfinder.com, about $334,078.40 per month winnable.
• Style transformation seekers — 102,600 searches per month, currently owned by www.instapainting.com, about $543,208.01 per month winnable.

Entering one of these market segments requires creating entirely new pages, not just making small tweaks to what you already have.

This is worth a look because there is significant interest in these areas that you are currently missing out on. If you decide to pursue these groups, your page writer would need to handle the creation of this new content, which would be a large job.

Real AI assistants (software programs that can understand and talk to people) were asked the questions this market asks, and AkOOre's own measurement system recorded who each answer cited. On this surface, there are no rankings or positions, only whether your site was mentioned as a source or was absent.

• 30 answers were tested
• 0 answers cited your site, including none from gpt-4.1-mini
• the three domains cited most instead were google.com (15), galrie.com (1), and mireillefineart.com (1)

Those three names are the competition on this surface, and they may not be the same names as the competitors you see in standard search results.

This is worth a look because your site is currently being left out of these AI-generated answers. If you want to change this, whoever writes your pages can do so by making your answers more direct and easy for machines to read, which is a manageable task.

Every question listed below is asked by a specific group of potential customers, answered by AI assistants (software programs that provide direct answers to queries), and answered without mentioning your site — each one represents a citation donated to the source named beside it. This means when people ask these things, they are being sent to other businesses instead of yours.

The rows with no page are content to create, and the rows with a page are pages to make quotable.

This is worth a look because you are missing out on massive amounts of interest from people looking for art information. If you decide to act, whoever writes your pages can handle this by creating new, short sections that directly answer these specific questions, which is a relatively small job.

This analysis focuses on the page at https://originaluniqueart.com/.

The biggest obstacle to being quoted is that the page is completely anonymous and undated, meaning it lacks author and date signals (E-E-A-T) (the information that proves who wrote the content and how recently it was published). You should add a visible author line and a visible published or updated date near the top of the content to make the page more credible to visitors, to Google, and to AI assistants choosing which sources to cite.

This is worth a look because it helps build trust with both humans and AI. This is a small job that whoever writes your pages can handle easily. Adding these details ensures your content is seen as reliable and fresh.

On the page /en/art-auction/, we checked how ready it is to provide answers to AI assistants.

The biggest obstacle to being quoted is that the page is completely anonymous and undated, meaning it lacks an author, a byline, or a date in the code. You should show who is behind this content and how fresh it is by adding a visible author line and a visible published or updated date near the top of the content.

This is worth a look because it helps make your page more credible to both visitors and AI assistants. This is a small job that whoever writes your pages can handle easily. Adding these simple trust signals can help ensure your content is seen as a reliable source.

This analysis focuses on the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/corporate/.

The biggest obstacle to being quoted is that the page lacks author and date signals, meaning it is not provably current, and signed by someone. You should add a visible author line and a visible published or updated date near the top of the content to help build trust.

This is worth a look because it helps assistants trust your information. This is a small job for whoever writes your pages. Adding a name and a date is a quick way to improve your credibility.

This analysis focuses on the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/.

The biggest obstacle to being quoted is that the page lacks author and date signals, meaning it is not provably current, and signed by someone. You should add a visible author line and a visible published or updated date near the top of the content.

This is worth a look because it helps build trust with both people and AI. This is a small job that whoever writes your pages can handle easily. Adding these details helps ensure your content is seen as credible and fresh.

This analysis focuses on the page /en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/.

The biggest obstacle to being quoted is that the page is completely anonymous and undated, meaning it lacks author and date signals (E-E-A-T). You should show who is behind this content and how fresh it is by adding a visible author line and a visible published or updated date near the top of the content.

This is worth a look because it helps build trust with both people and AI. This is a small job that whoever writes your pages can handle easily. Adding these details will help make your content more credible.

AkOOre's own measurement system took apart 42 answers that cited someone else instead of you to see what the winning pages have in common. We tallied the specific habits found on those successful pages to show you exactly what is working for your competitors.

• question-shaped headings & lists (38)
• figures, sources & citations (29)
• a direct answer up front (22)

The domains that keep winning these citations instead of you include google.com (15), galrie.com (1), and mireillefineart.com (1). The pages on your site losing the most opportunities are /en/orders/photo-to-painting/family/ (14), /en/orders/photo_to_restyled_masterpiece/ (10), and /en/orders/photo-to-painting/startup/ (8).

This is worth a look because you can improve your results by making small, concrete edits to those specific pages. The person who writes your page content can implement these changes as a relatively small job.

Each row represents one AI crawler's reader (an automated program that visits your site to learn about it) standing at your digital door. If a reader is genuinely shut out, it means that specific assistant can never cite your site when answering questions, no matter how good your content is.

Your robots.txt (the file where you tell automated visitors which parts of your site they can or cannot visit) leaves most doors open, but there is a conflict with how your server actually responds to visits. Because some rows show 'Blocked or unknown', we cannot be certain if these assistants are truly being turned away or if our test was simply not recognised as a valid visitor; the only way to know for sure is for someone to check your site's own visitor logs.

This situation is worth a look because your server is refusing some visitors that your instructions say are welcome. Your web developer should investigate your firewall (the security system that filters who can enter your site) to see if it is accidentally blocking legitimate AI assistants, which is typically a small technical task.

Your site has an llms.txt file (a machine-readable summary that tells AI assistants what your site is about), which is a good sign. Your policy is deliberate because you have explicit rules naming 7 specific training crawlers (automated programs that scrape your site to teach AI models) like GPTBot and ClaudeBot.

Blocking AI crawlers is a legitimate choice: it protects your content and gives up the citations. The only wrong version is the accidental one. Removing the 214 Disallow rules (instructions in your site's code that tell bots which parts of your site they are not allowed to visit) from your robots.txt file would flip your current state.

This is worth a look for you. You should have your web developer review these rules to ensure you aren't accidentally hiding important pages from AI assistants. This is a relatively small job for a professional.

You have 80 items still to address in your SEO (Search Engine Optimization, which is the process of making your site easier for search engines to understand) plan that must be handled to improve your visibility.

1. 80 items still to do — needs minutes, no special skills.

You have 0 items that you have already ticked off.

This is worth a look because there is a significant amount of work remaining to improve how your site performs. You can tackle these tasks yourself or with an editor, and it will likely be a big job to clear the entire list.

Everything on this list can be cleared today without a developer — the audit's free points.

• Add and promote your top pages (table below → the ones without a link to their report). They deserve the detailed per-page report, the speed audit and the AI-visibility test before any other page.
• Claim your profile on the two or three review platforms of your sector, then ask satisfied customers for a review in your order follow-up email. This is the fastest trust signal to build, and the one AI assistants repeat when someone asks about you.
• Put the full contact block in your footer so it appears on every page: company name, postal address, phone, email, and the registration/VAT number. It costs nothing and it is what a buyer (and a quality rater) looks for before trusting an unknown site.
• List your real profiles in the sameAs array of the Organization block: LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, your review-platform profile, and any Wikipedia/Wikidata entry. Only claim profiles you actually control and keep updated.
• Promote one page of each URL structure that has none yet — the largest unsampled ones are /en/art/*/, /en/articles/*/, /en/artists/groupby/*/, /en/art/groupby/*/, /en/art/list_category/*/ — before promoting a second page of a structure already covered. The pages list's Auto select button does exactly that first, then fills the remaining slots by Priority.
• Keep it current when your offer changes — an outdated summary is worse than none.

Clearing this list is the fastest improvement available, and a good first week.

This is worth a look because these tasks help build trust with both humans and AI. You can handle most of these yourself, though some might require your web developer to help with the technical code. These are generally small jobs that can be finished quickly.

Your site is currently invisible to collectors because its young age of only 4 months and a massive content gap of 690 terms have created a visibility vacuum that prevents you from gaining any organic traffic (the number of visitors who find you through search engines without clicking an ad).

• The 4-month age of your domain and the 690 content gaps act as a ceiling that prevents other improvements from working.
• A lack of author identity, contact details, and a Team page creates E-E-A-T deficits (the signals that prove to search engines you are a real, trustworthy expert), which further starves your site of visibility.
• The 214 Disallow rules (instructions in your site's code that tell search engines which parts of your site not to look at) in your robots.txt file (the file that tells search engine crawlers how to behave on your site) and 11 high-volume unanswered buyer questions are preventing you from winning AI citations (when an AI assistant like ChatGPT mentions your business as a recommendation).
• Having 79% of your existing links (connections from other websites to yours) concentrated on your home page prevents the rest of your site from building its own individual ranking power.

The 37/100 spam score (a metric used to flag sites that look like they are trying to trick search engines) is merely background noise that Google ignores and does not represent a real risk to your domain.

You will know you are making progress when your organic traffic rises from ~0/mo, your AI citation wins increase from 0%, your search visibility improves from 24%, and the 690 content gaps are reduced.

This situation is urgent because your brand is currently missing out on the growing segment of users who rely on AI for art services. This is a big job that will require your content writer to fill those massive gaps and your web developer to fix the technical instructions blocking search engines.