Start free

You are exploring AkOOre's demo website — read-only, nothing you change is saved.

Search Audit — originaluniqueart.com — generated on Oct. 17, 2026, 12:35 a.m. by AkOOre

Overview · Search Audit · originaluniqueart.com · 13 Oct 2026

Google sent 0 clicks in 28 days, and weak titles cost no measurable click.

Over 28 days, Google showed the site for 19 distinct queries: 52 impressions and 0 clicks. The clicks moved −100% against the window before. 5 of the 8 scored check points pass, 3 are critical. Brand queries are left out of every acquisition score.

Choose a section Or start here: A. Recommendations — action plan
Clicks
0
Impressions
52
CTR
0.0%
Clicks lost to titles
0
Impressions absorbed by AI
—
Search standing
72%

In this report

17 sections
19 queries · 24 check points
originaluniqueart.com · 13 Oct 2026

AStart here · Recommendations — action plan

8 recommendations, worst first.

The whole report as a to-do list, worst first; the copy-paste fixes to titles and descriptions are the quick wins.

  1. Impressions with a rich result
  2. Buying-intent share of impressions
  3. Brand CTR
  4. Google-visible questions tested on assistants
8recommendations Read the plan BSearch Console coverage — what these numbers are

19 queries read from Search Console.

Google's own count of what it served: the window, the property read and the share of impressions the query rows describe.

Perfectproblems to fix Open B CClick opportunities — CTR against the position's expectation

No click lost to a weak title.

Each query's click-through rate against the rate its position should earn, and the clicks that gap costs.

0clicks lost this window Open C DAI absorption — clicks lost at a stable position (GEO)

No previous window to compare with yet.

Queries whose impressions and position held while their clicks collapsed: the answer is being read on Google itself.

Perfectproblems to fix Open D EStriking distance — one push from page one

0 queries at positions 4 to 20.

Queries already shown at positions 4 to 20, with the clicks a higher position would earn on the same impressions.

0queries one push from page one Open E
FAssistant visibility — ranking in Google, read by AI? (GEO)

The scored point passes.

The queries Google shows you for, against whether AI crawlers may read those pages and whether assistants cite you.

Perfectproblems to fix Open F GCannibalization — one query, several of your pages

No query split across two pages.

Queries shown with two or more of your pages, and pages Google ranks instead of the one you targeted.

0queries in contention Open G HQuestions — the prompts people also ask assistants (GEO)

0 question-shaped queries.

The how, what and why queries people also ask assistants, joined with how answerable the ranking page is.

0questions Google shows you for Open H IQuery trends — new, rising, decaying, lost

Clicks −100% on the previous window.

The current window against the one before it, query by query: new, rising, decaying and lost.

Perfectproblems to fix Open I JBrand vs non-brand — who searched for you by name

0 % of the clicks are non-brand.

Clicks from people who searched your name against everyone else: the split every acquisition figure leaves out.

Criticalproblems to fix Open J KIntent mix — found while researching or while buying

0 % of impressions on buying queries.

Impressions, clicks and queries split by search intent: transactional, commercial, informational, navigational.

Criticalproblems to fix Open K LDevice & country — where the impressions come from

0 % of the clicks on mobile.

Clicks and positions per device, and the countries the site is shown to without being clicked.

0 %of the clicks on mobile Open L MSearch appearance — rich results earned

No rich result in Google's report.

The impressions Google reports with a special appearance (product, review, video, breadcrumb) and their CTR.

Criticalproblems to fix Open M NTraffic value — what the clicks are worth

1 informational point, none scored.

Google's clicks priced at the keywords' cost per click, and your share of the measured search demand.

1point to read Open N OProgress & re-check

Standing 56% → 72% over 4 readings.

The search standing at every reading, one point a day at most, and the way to the full history.

72%search standing now Open O PHow to read this report

5 questions on the figures.

Where the figures come from, why the rows do not add up, and what expected CTR and AI absorption mean.

5answers Open P QConclusion

Where this leaves you.

The verdict in plain words: where the clicks are, where they are lost, and what the AI-answer signals say.

72%search standing Open Q

Section A / QThe work

Recommendations — action plan

←
Guide

This section answers

What should I fix first, and which fixes need no ranking change?

Evidence

8recommendations, worst first

0/8 marked done by you. Marks stay until the next re-read measures the check again, so a line you fixed shows struck through until Google's figures agree with you.

Fix first — critical (3)

  1. Impressions with a rich result developer task (M. Search appearance — rich results earned — this check scores 20/100)
    What to do: Add the structured data the pages qualify for — Product with price and rating, BreadcrumbList on every page, VideoObject where a video plays, Article with author and date — and validate it in Google's rich results test. FAQPage and HowTo no longer earn a rich result for a commercial site. The SEO report's structured data section says what each audited page carries today.
    What we measured on your site: no impression carried a special appearance — every result was a plain blue link
    Why it matters: The share of the property's impressions that carried a special appearance — a rich result, a video, a product or review snippet. Rich results out-click plain links at the same position, and the structured data behind them is what AI assistants read too.
    Where to see the detail: the M. Search appearance — rich results earned section shows this check with the data it is based on.
  2. Buying-intent share of impressions content work (K. Intent mix — found while researching or while buying — this check scores 25/100)
    What to do: If the site sells, it needs pages that answer the buying queries of its field — comparison, price, 'best X for Y' — not only the explanatory ones. The keyword strategy report lists the buying keywords in reach.
    What we measured on your site: 0% buying intent — transactional 0, commercial 0, informational 0, navigational 23 impressions
    Why it matters: The share of impressions on transactional and commercial queries — people comparing or buying. Read from the wording (buy, price, best, vs…) and from the Google Ads intent classification where AkOOre holds one for the keyword.
    Where to see the detail: the K. Intent mix — found while researching or while buying section shows this check with the data it is based on.
  3. Brand CTR quick copy-paste (J. Brand vs non-brand — who searched for you by name — this check scores 30/100)
    What to do: Search your own name and look at what sits above you. Make the homepage title start with the company name, add Organization structured data with the logo and the social profiles, and consider a small brand campaign in Google Ads — brand clicks are the cheapest there are.
    What we measured on your site: brand CTR 0.0% (0 clicks on 23 impressions), average position 4.5
    Why it matters: The click-through rate on the queries naming the company. People who type your name mean to reach you; a brand CTR under half means an ad, a marketplace or a review site is taking those clicks above you.
    Where to see the detail: the J. Brand vs non-brand — who searched for you by name section shows this check with the data it is based on.

Opportunities (5)

Not faults, so no score: what the measured demand suggests doing next.

  1. Google-visible questions tested on assistants content work (F. Assistant visibility — ranking in Google, read by AI? (GEO))
    What to do with it: The questions AkOOre tests are generated from each audited page's content; audit the pages ranking on the queries below and the two lists will start to overlap.
    What the data says: 0 question-shaped query(ies) with impressions, none matching one of the 65 question(s) already tested on assistants
    Why it matters: Whether the questions Google shows the site for were also put to an AI assistant by AkOOre's answer tests, and whether the assistant cited the site.
    Where to see the detail: the F. Assistant visibility — ranking in Google, read by AI? (GEO) section shows this check with the data it is based on.
  2. Lost queries that used to bring clicks developer task (I. Query trends — new, rising, decaying, lost)
    What to do with it: Start with these: they were paying. Open the page that ranked and confirm it still exists, still says what the query asks, and is still linked from the site.
    What the data says: 0 query(ies) with clicks faded, 0 clicks fewer: —
    Why it matters: Of the faded queries, the ones that used to bring clicks — the loss that shows in traffic, scored on the previous window's clicks kept.
    Where to see the detail: the I. Query trends — new, rising, decaying, lost section shows this check with the data it is based on.
  3. New queries content work (I. Query trends — new, rising, decaying, lost)
    What to do with it: A new query with real impressions and a weak position is a page to strengthen while the demand is fresh.
    What the data says: 0 new query(ies), 0 impressions, 0 clicks: —
    Why it matters: Queries with impressions this window and none in the previous one — new demand, or pages that just started ranking.
    Where to see the detail: the I. Query trends — new, rising, decaying, lost section shows this check with the data it is based on.
  4. Non-brand share of clicks content work (J. Brand vs non-brand — who searched for you by name)
    What to do with it: Grow the non-brand side: the striking-distance and question sections list the queries where the site is already shown and a better page would earn the click.
    What the data says: 0 non-brand clicks vs 0 brand clicks (—% non-brand) over 18 non-brand and 1 brand query(ies)
    Why it matters: The clicks earned on queries that do not name the company, as a share of all clicks — the acquisition the SEO work actually produced. A site living on its brand is not being found, it is being looked up.
    Where to see the detail: the J. Brand vs non-brand — who searched for you by name section shows this check with the data it is based on.
  5. Informational queries with clicks content work (K. Intent mix — found while researching or while buying)
    What to do with it: Give each of these pages a path to the buying pages — a related product, a comparison, a quote form — so the research visit can become a customer.
    What the data says: 0 informational query(ies) with clicks, 0 clicks in all: —
    Why it matters: The informational queries that bring clicks — the pages that earn the research phase. These are also what the assistants are asked, so they are the site's GEO front line.
    Where to see the detail: the K. Intent mix — found while researching or while buying section shows this check with the data it is based on.

Section B / QThe source

Search Console coverage — what these numbers are

Guide

This section answers

What exactly do these figures count, and how much of Google's data do they describe?

Terms used

ImpressionsProperty

EvidencePerfect

100% Perfect2/2 scored points pass.

19distinct queries read Oct. 13, 2026, 8:26 p.m. from sc-domain:originaluniqueart.com, covering 100.0% of the property's impressions

Scope of this audit

Every figure below the header is a statement about a sample. This is the sample: how big the site is estimated to be, how much of it AkOOre measured, and which of Google's own figures were available to check it against.

Estimated URLs on the site 646,345 estimate extrapolated from the 100 of 16,033 sitemap files read (2,604 URLs listed in them)
URLs sampled ! 6 in depth · 3,669 stored <0.01% of the estimate carry the full per-page audit (promoted pages); 0.6% are stored with the free light analysis
Sitemap URLs read ! 2,604 / 646,345 100 of 16,033 sitemap file(s) read by the page discovery pass
Templates sampled ! 4 / 24 URL structures with at least one promoted page, over the structures discovered; the 20 unsampled ones cover 591 collected URL(s), the largest being /en/art/*/, /en/articles/*/, /en/artists/groupby/*/, /en/art/groupby/*/, /en/art/list_category/*/
Languages sampled ! 1 / 32 languages the promoted pages are written in, over the languages the site declares (html lang and hreflang); not sampled: ar, bg, cs, da, de, el, es, et, fi, fr, hi, hr, hu, it, ja, ka, ko, lt, nl, no, pl, pt, ro, ru, sk, sl, sr, sv, tr, uk, zh
Google-indexed URLs ! ≥ 42 (0% of the estimate) pages Google served at least once in the last 90 days — a floor of the index, since an indexed page nobody searched for is not counted Sitemaps in Search Console declare 972 URLs (Google no longer reports the indexed count per sitemap).
Googlebot log coverage none AkOOre reads no server logs, so crawl-frequency and crawl-budget statements in this report are inferred from sitemap dates, index status and robots rules, never measured

Page counts are estimates AkOOre limits its own crawler, so what it stored is smaller than the site: only 100 of the site's 16,033 sitemap files were read, so the URL total is extrapolated from those.

Weak Read as a sample: the page-level findings come from the 6 promoted page(s), <0.01% of the site's estimated 646,345 URLs, spanning 4 of the 24 URL structures discovered. Promote a page of each unsampled structure (the pages list's Auto select does this first) to widen it.

19 / 19The queries, biggest first

Query Page Google showed Impressions Clicks CTR Position Expected CTR Clicks lost Intent
site:originaluniqueart.com brand https://originaluniqueart.com/de/ +9 23 0 0.0% 4.5 7.15% — Navigational
obra única https://originaluniqueart.com/es/ 6 0 0.0% 87.7 0.5% 0 Informational
unik konst https://originaluniqueart.com/sv/ 4 0 0.0% 77.8 0.5% 0 Informational
unik konst online https://originaluniqueart.com/sv/ 4 0 0.0% 95.0 0.5% 0 Informational
original art https://originaluniqueart.com/en/ +2 4 0 0.0% 83.8 0.5% 0 Informational
arte único https://originaluniqueart.com/es/ 2 0 0.0% 92.0 0.5% 0 Informational
original paintings https://originaluniqueart.com/sv/ 2 0 0.0% 81.0 0.5% 0 Informational
unique paintings https://originaluniqueart.com/en/ 2 0 0.0% 73.0 0.5% 0 Informational
art of unique https://originaluniqueart.com/en/ 1 0 0.0% 83.0 0.5% 0 Informational
art original https://originaluniqueart.com/en/ 1 0 0.0% 95.0 0.5% 0 Informational
obra arte unica https://originaluniqueart.com/es/ 1 0 0.0% 91.0 0.5% 0 Informational
original artwork https://originaluniqueart.com/ru/ 1 0 0.0% 87.0 0.5% 0 Informational
originalkunst https://originaluniqueart.com/de/ 1 0 0.0% 42.0 0.5% 0 Informational
unique art paintings https://originaluniqueart.com/en/ 1 0 0.0% 85.0 0.5% 0 Informational
unique art pieces https://originaluniqueart.com/en/ 1 0 0.0% 60.0 0.5% 0 Informational
unique art studio https://originaluniqueart.com/ru/ 1 0 0.0% 78.0 0.5% 0 Informational
unique art tattoo https://originaluniqueart.com/ru/ 1 0 0.0% 71.0 0.5% 0 Informational
unique artwork https://originaluniqueart.com/en/ 1 0 0.0% 78.0 0.5% 0 Informational
unique artworks https://originaluniqueart.com/en/ 1 0 0.0% 82.0 0.5% 0 Informational

Full table — every query (19)

Check points of the A. Search Console coverage — what these numbers are section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Search Console property matched
developer task
Whether one of the Search Console properties the owner authorized covers this domain. A domain property (sc-domain:) is preferred: it covers every subdomain and both schemes at once. 		reading sc-domain:originaluniqueart.com Good
100%
—
Data freshness
How old this reading is. The queries are re-read every week; the window itself always stops three days short of today, because Google finalises a day's data late. 		read 3 day(s) ago — window 2026-09-12 to 2026-10-10 (28 days), previous window 2026-08-14 to 2026-09-11 Good
100%
—
Rows stored and coverage
How much of what Google served the stored rows describe. Google withholds the rare queries from the query list (privacy), and the collection keeps the top rows by clicks, so the rows never add up to the property total — the difference is the long tail, real but unnamed. 		30 query-page rows stored for the current window, 19 distinct queries, covering 100.0% of the property's impressions Info —
The window in four figures
The property's own totals over the window — Google's aggregate, which includes the withheld queries — and how each moved against the previous window. 		0 clicks (−100%), 52 impressions (+93%), CTR 0.0%, average position 59.7 (previous window: 2 clicks, position 22.7) Info —

Section C / QQuick wins

Click opportunities — CTR against the position's expectation

Guide

This section answers

Which queries lose clicks because their title and description fail to win them?

Terms used

CTRExpected CTRBrand query

Evidence

Informational only — no scored points.

Check points of the B. Click opportunities — CTR against the position's expectation section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Clicks lost to under-performing titles
quick copy-paste
The clicks the queries lose against the CTR their position should earn. 		no non-brand query shown 20 times or more this window — nothing to read a CTR from yet Info —

Section D / QGEO

AI absorption — clicks lost at a stable position (GEO)

Guide

This section answers

Which queries kept their position but lost their clicks to an answer on the results page?

Terms used

AI OverviewZero-click

EvidencePerfect

100% Perfect1/1 scored points pass.

Check points of the C. AI absorption — clicks lost at a stable position (GEO) section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Impressions drifting to zero clicks
content work
The share of comparable non-brand impressions on queries whose position held (within 1.5 places) and impressions held (within 20%%) while the clicks fell by 40%% or more. Nothing about the ranking changed; what changed is that the answer no longer needs a visit — the signature of an AI Overview or answer box. 		no query lost its clicks at a stable position — 0 comparable query(ies) read against the previous window Good
100%
—

Section E / QNext push

Striking distance — one push from page one

Guide

This section answers

Which queries sit at positions 4 to 20, one push from the top of page one?

Terms used

Striking distanceAverage position

Evidence

Informational only — no scored points.

Check points of the D. Striking distance — one push from page one section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Clicks recoverable
content work
The clicks a higher position would earn on the impressions the site already gets at positions 4-20. 		no non-brand query shown 20 times or more this window Info —

Section F / QGEO

Assistant visibility — ranking in Google, read by AI? (GEO)

Guide

This section answers

Do AI assistants read and cite the pages Google already shows?

Terms used

Citation crawlerAI answer test

EvidencePerfect

100% Perfect1/1 scored points pass.

Check points of the E. Assistant visibility — ranking in Google, read by AI? (GEO) section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
AI citation crawlers may read the site
developer task
Whether the bots that fetch pages for AI answers (OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, PerplexityBot, Claude-SearchBot, Google-Extended) pass both doors of the crawler access report. Every impression Google gives the site is on a page these bots need to be able to read before an assistant can cite it. 		all 6 citation crawler(s) may read the site Good
100%
—
Google-visible questions tested on assistants
content work
Whether the questions Google shows the site for were also put to an AI assistant by AkOOre's answer tests, and whether the assistant cited the site. 		0 question-shaped query(ies) with impressions, none matching one of the 65 question(s) already tested on assistants Info
Recommendation: The questions AkOOre tests are generated from each audited page's content; audit the pages ranking on the queries below and the two lists will start to overlap.

Section G / QConflicts

Cannibalization — one query, several of your pages

Guide

This section answers

Which queries are split across several of your own pages?

Terms used

Cannibalization

Evidence

Informational only — no scored points.

Check points of the F. Cannibalization — one query, several of your pages section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Queries split across several pages
content work
Queries for which two or more of the site's pages are shown. 		no non-brand query shown 20 times or more this window Info —

Section H / QGEO

Questions — the prompts people also ask assistants (GEO)

Guide

This section answers

Which question-shaped queries show you, and do those pages answer them?

Terms used

Answerability

Evidence

Informational only — no scored points.

Check points of the G. Questions — the prompts people also ask assistants (GEO) section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Question queries share
content work
The share of non-brand impressions on question-shaped queries — how much of the site's Google visibility is the kind of demand that also goes to assistants. 		0 question query(ies), 0 impressions (0% of non-brand), 0 clicks; biggest: — Info —

Section J / QContext

Brand vs non-brand — who searched for you by name

Guide

This section answers

How many of the clicks come from people searching for you by name?

Terms used

Brand queryNon-brand

EvidenceCritical

30% Critical0/1 scored points pass. Weakest point: Brand CTR (30%).

Clicks: brand vs non-brand

Non-brand — 0 clicks (0%) Brand — 0 clicks (0%)

Check points of the I. Brand vs non-brand — who searched for you by name section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Non-brand share of clicks
content work
The clicks earned on queries that do not name the company, as a share of all clicks — the acquisition the SEO work actually produced. A site living on its brand is not being found, it is being looked up. 		0 non-brand clicks vs 0 brand clicks (—% non-brand) over 18 non-brand and 1 brand query(ies) Info
Recommendation: Grow the non-brand side: the striking-distance and question sections list the queries where the site is already shown and a better page would earn the click.
Brand CTR
quick copy-paste
The click-through rate on the queries naming the company. People who type your name mean to reach you; a brand CTR under half means an ad, a marketplace or a review site is taking those clicks above you. 		brand CTR 0.0% (0 clicks on 23 impressions), average position 4.5 Critical
30%
How to fix: Search your own name and look at what sits above you. Make the homepage title start with the company name, add Organization structured data with the logo and the social profiles, and consider a small brand campaign in Google Ads — brand clicks are the cheapest there are.
Brand terms used
The terms a query has to contain to count as brand — derived from the domain and the website name. 		brand terms: originaluniqueart — matched by 1 query(ies) Info —

Section K / QContext

Intent mix — found while researching or while buying

Guide

This section answers

Is the site found while people research, or while they buy?

Terms used

Search intent

EvidenceCritical

25% Critical0/1 scored points pass. Weakest point: Buying-intent share of impressions (25%).

Impressions by intent

Transactional — 0 impressions, 0 clicks, 0 queriesCommercial — 0 impressions, 0 clicks, 0 queriesInformational — 0 impressions, 0 clicks, 0 queriesNavigational — 23 impressions, 0 clicks, 1 queries

Check points of the J. Intent mix — found while researching or while buying section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Buying-intent share of impressions
content work
The share of impressions on transactional and commercial queries — people comparing or buying. Read from the wording (buy, price, best, vs…) and from the Google Ads intent classification where AkOOre holds one for the keyword. 		0% buying intent — transactional 0, commercial 0, informational 0, navigational 23 impressions Critical
25%
How to fix: If the site sells, it needs pages that answer the buying queries of its field — comparison, price, 'best X for Y' — not only the explanatory ones. The keyword strategy report lists the buying keywords in reach.
Informational queries with clicks
content work
The informational queries that bring clicks — the pages that earn the research phase. These are also what the assistants are asked, so they are the site's GEO front line. 		0 informational query(ies) with clicks, 0 clicks in all: — Info
Recommendation: Give each of these pages a path to the buying pages — a related product, a comparison, a quote form — so the research visit can become a customer.
Navigational queries
Queries that look for a specific site or page — mostly the brand ones, counted in the brand section. 		1 navigational query(ies), 0 clicks Info —

Section L / QContext

Device & country — where the impressions come from

Guide

This section answers

Which devices and countries do the impressions and the clicks come from?

Terms used

Mobile-first indexing

Evidence

Informational only — no scored points.

Clicks by device

Desktop — 0 clicks, 49 impressions, CTR 0.0%, position 58.0Mobile — 0 clicks, 3 impressions, CTR 0.0%, position 87.3

Countries by impressions

CountryImpressionsClicksCTRPosition
USA1400.0%23.1
SWE1100.0%85.5
ESP1000.0%86.1
POL400.0%59.8
SGP300.0%8.7
ARE200.0%88.0
GBR200.0%82.0
IND200.0%90.0
CAN100.0%82.0
DEU100.0%42.0
FIN100.0%71.0
JOR100.0%1.0
Check points of the K. Device & country — where the impressions come from section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Mobile share of clicks
How the clicks split by device. 		Desktop: 0 clicks (0%), 49 impressions, position 58.0; Mobile: 0 clicks (0%), 3 impressions, position 87.3 Info —

Section M / QContext

Search appearance — rich results earned

Guide

This section answers

Which rich results did the pages earn, and on how many impressions?

Terms used

Rich resultStructured data

EvidenceCritical

20% Critical0/1 scored points pass. Weakest point: Impressions with a rich result (20%).

Check points of the L. Search appearance — rich results earned section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Impressions with a rich result
developer task
The share of the property's impressions that carried a special appearance — a rich result, a video, a product or review snippet. Rich results out-click plain links at the same position, and the structured data behind them is what AI assistants read too. 		no impression carried a special appearance — every result was a plain blue link Critical
20%
How to fix: Add the structured data the pages qualify for — Product with price and rating, BreadcrumbList on every page, VideoObject where a video plays, Article with author and date — and validate it in Google's rich results test. FAQPage and HowTo no longer earn a rich result for a commercial site. The SEO report's structured data section says what each audited page carries today.

Section N / QMoney

Traffic value — what the clicks are worth

Guide

This section answers

What would the organic clicks cost if they were bought as ads?

Terms used

CPCImpression share

Evidence

Informational only — no scored points.

Check points of the M. Traffic value — what the clicks are worth section
Check point Found Quality How to fix / recommendation
Monthly value of the organic clicks
Google's clicks joined with the cost per click of the same keyword — what buying the traffic would cost. 		none of the sized queries matches a keyword AkOOre holds market data for Info —

Section O / QIs the work paying off

Progress & re-check

Guide

This section answers

Is the work earning clicks from one reading to the next?

Evidence

72% Improvablesearch standing

5Good
0Needs work
3Critical

Search standing trend — from 56% to 72% (lowest 56%, highest 72%)

Sep 28: 56% → Sep 30: 56% → Oct 7: 72% → Oct 13: 72%

Open the full history

Section P / QReference

How to read this report

Guide

This section answers

Where do these numbers come from, and what do the report's words mean?

Terms used

Expected CTRAbsorbed by AI
Where do these numbers come from?

From Google Search Console's Performance report, read with the authorization the owner granted. They are Google's own count of what it served — not a third-party estimate. Google finalises a day's data about three days late, so every window stops short of today.

Why do the query rows not add up to the totals?

Google withholds the rare queries from the query list (they still count in the property totals), and the collection keeps the top rows by clicks. The coverage section says what share of the impressions the rows describe.

What is "expected CTR"?

The share of clicks a result earns at a given average position on an ordinary results page — roughly 28% in first place, 11% in third, 2.4% in tenth. A query far under its line is a title problem, or a results page where something sits above you.

What does "absorbed by AI" mean?

A query whose position and impressions held while its clicks collapsed against the previous window. Nothing about the ranking changed; what changed is that the answer no longer needs a visit — an AI Overview or an answer box gives it on the results page. The page's job then is to be the source that answer cites.

Why exclude brand queries?

People searching for the company by name were coming anyway, and they click whatever the title says. Counting them would inflate every CTR and hide the real acquisition. The brand section reads them on their own.

Section Q / QRead from the figures

Conclusion

→
Guide

This section answers

What do the measured results mean for this site, and where are its clicks?

Findings · 2026-10-13

Google shows your site to 52 people, but none of them clicked—a 100% drop from the previous period.

What Google shows your site for

Google is showing your site more often, with the number of people seeing you in search rising from 27 to 52. However, you earned 0 clicks this period, a 100% drop from the previous window. Your average position fell from 22.7 to 59.7, meaning you are appearing much further down in search results. Most of this visibility comes from desktop users, while mobile users account for only 3 impressions. Almost all of the demand comes from people searching for your business by name rather than looking to buy anything, as there were 0 transactional, 0 commercial, and 0 informational clicks. Even when people search for your brand, they are not clicking, leaving your brand share of clicks at 0.0%.

Where the clicks are going missing

  • 'site:originaluniqueart.com' — the title does not win the click the position already offers — 0 clicks a window.

What AI assistants are doing with your pages

The site is protected. No queries lost clicks to AI answers shown on the results page. All 6 AI assistant crawlers can read your site, but no one is finding answers to questions through them because no question-shaped queries are being served. Currently, your site earns no rich results in search.

Add to your ToDo list