You are exploring AkOOre's demo website — read-only, nothing you change is saved.

← Back to the report

Full table

Every website linking to you

Every website linking to you — OriginalUniqueArt.com — rows 1–45 of 45, sorted by Its power /1000 (descending) — printed on Nov. 5, 2026, 10:47 p.m. by AkOOre

For OriginalUniqueArt.com — back to this section of the report.

45 rows in total — showing 1–45 XLSX (45) CSV
  1. 223

    wikioo.org

    Power 227/1000

  2. 27

    artshopreviews.com

    Power 185/1000

  3. 176

    topimpressionists.com

    Power 169/1000

  4. 146

    mus3ums.com

    Power 156/1000

  5. 122

    artsdot.com

    Power 153/1000

  6. 106

    most-famous-paintings.com

    Power 147/1000

  7. 123

    allpaintingsstore.com

    Power 122/1000

  8. 5

    wahooart.com

    Power 48/1000

  9. 2

    absolutearts.com

    Links to you

  10. 1

    archive-hu.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  11. 10

    artoffer.com

    Links to you

  12. 4

    artscad.com

    Links to you

  13. 1

    bestnz-poker-casinoslot.com

    Spam score 70/100: check it

  14. 1

    betulcrime.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  15. 1

    betwinnermirror.com

    Spam score 70/100: check it

  16. 1

    bruere.com

    Links to you

  17. 1

    bureatag.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  18. 7

    buypopart.com

    Links to you

  19. 2

    clifflisting.com

    Spam score 65/100: check it

  20. 1

    cvillico.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  21. 1

    dbike-us.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  22. 1

    dupurgeniefr.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  23. 1

    fashionclothingnews.com

    Spam score 70/100: check it

  24. 1

    ggmap.us.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  25. 1

    growyoursitetraffic.shop

    Spam score 80/100: check it

  26. 1

    homesforsaleoldgreenwichct.com

    Spam score 70/100: check it

  27. 3

    iseeyou.com

    Links to you

  28. 2

    kernelpanicpodcast.com

    Spam score 70/100: check it

  29. 1

    m98ufa.com

    Spam score 75/100: check it

  30. 1

    mediaboooster.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  31. 1

    onvaxs.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  32. 1

    onwebdirectory.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  33. 1

    plumeriamarketing.com

    Spam score 70/100: check it

  34. 1

    quotesblom.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  35. 2

    rank-seo-now.shop

    Spam score 70/100: check it

  36. 1

    sahammurah.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  37. 1

    seolinkagency.shop

    Links to you

  38. 2

    seonix.agency

    Spam score 70/100: check it

  39. 2

    shankargallery.blogspot.com

    Spam score 75/100: check it

  40. 1

    techbumppy.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  41. 1

    thcradar.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  42. 1

    thedocmag.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  43. 1

    theforbestimes.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  44. 1

    uncledspizza.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

  45. 1

    websquemolan.com

    Spam score 60/100: check it

Switch to List or Table to see every column.

How to read this table

  • Website linking to you — The domain the links come from.
  • Visitors it sent (12 mo) — Visits Google Analytics recorded coming from this website over the last 12 months (referral traffic). A link that sends people is worth more than its rank alone says.
  • Sales it sent (12 mo) — Purchase revenue of those visits (GA4, your Analytics currency).
  • Its power /1000 — How strong that website is, from 0 to 1000. A link from a strong site is worth many links from weak ones.
  • Links to you — How many links it points at your site in total.
  • Of those, dofollow — Links that actually pass ranking power. The rest still bring visitors but do not lift your rankings.
  • Its spam score /100 — How spammy the site looks, 0 to 100, judged from its own links. Above 60 is junk, 31-60 worth a look — a risk signal, not a cause of weak rankings: Google discounts links you never asked for.
  • Links hitting a broken page — Links from this site that land on a page of yours that no longer exists — value you are throwing away, and the easiest backlinks you will ever recover.
  • Your broken pages it hits — How many distinct dead pages of yours it points at.
  • Its pages linking to you — How many separate pages of that site carry a link.
  • Websites linking to it — How many sites link to *it* — a quick read on whether it is itself respected.
  • Its distinct IPs — Different servers behind those links. Many links from a single IP often means one owner running a link network.
  • First seen — When this domain was first seen linking to you.
  • Last link lost — When its most recent link disappeared. A filled cell here on a strong domain is worth an email.

Questions about this table

What is a dofollow link and why does the count matter?

A dofollow link passes a share of the linking site's reputation to you; a nofollow one does not, by explicit instruction in the HTML. Both bring visitors, but only dofollow links lift rankings. A domain sending fifty links of which zero are dofollow is traffic, not authority.

Should I try to remove links from high-spam-score domains?

Usually not. Google ignores most junk links by itself, and disavowing is easy to get wrong. Act only if you see a large, sudden cluster of high-scoring domains with irrelevant anchors — that pattern suggests a deliberate attack, not natural noise.

What is the fastest win in this table?

The broken-links column. Someone already decided to link to you and the link now lands on a dead page. Redirect that old URL to the closest live page and the value comes back immediately, without asking anyone for anything.

A strong domain shows a lost date — is it worth chasing?

Yes, it is one of the highest-return emails you can send. The site already judged you worth linking to once. Links usually disappear because a page was rewritten or removed, not because of a decision about you, so a short polite note often restores it.

Is it better to have many links from one site or a few from many?

A few from many. After the first handful, extra links from the same domain add very little. Fifty domains linking once each is far stronger than one domain linking fifty times.

Why do the totals here differ from the count in the report?

The report's headline counts the whole profile as AkOOre's estimation system measures it. This table holds the domains that were downloaded and stored, biggest first, so on very large profiles it is a strong sample rather than every single domain.

How fresh is this data?

It is the last data collected for your site — nothing is fetched live when you open this page. Each block of data is re-collected on its own schedule by the automatic tasks. The report page shows the collection status of every section, and the Re-collect all data button there starts a fresh round when you have applied your fixes.

Why does the total here differ from the number in the report?

It does not — the report simply shows the first 25 rows as a preview, and this page shows every row that was stored. What can differ is the number quoted in a check point: those are often counted over the whole domain by AkOOre's estimation system, while this table only holds the rows that were downloaded and kept.

How do sorting and paging work?

Click any column heading to sort by it; click it again to reverse the order. Rows with no value stay at the bottom either way. Pages hold 100 rows and keep your sort as you move between them, so the link you copy always reopens the same view.

What should I actually do with this table?

Use it to pick targets, not to admire numbers. Sort by the column that matches your goal, take the first handful of rows, and turn them into concrete work — a page to write, a link to ask for, a title to rewrite. The report's action plan already ranks the most urgent of those for you.

← Back to the report

Send feedback